-
beckybold reblogged this from kafkawannab
-
mshedden reblogged this from theskrimmer
-
eireannmarie reblogged this from sometimesagreatnotion
-
captainbackfire reblogged this from theskrimmer
-
jennymack liked this
-
theskrimmer reblogged this from sometimesagreatnotion
-
telkb reblogged this from sometimesagreatnotion
-
tender-curiosity liked this
-
leyendecker liked this
-
noblank liked this
-
hotchagirl reblogged this from sometimesagreatnotion
-
kafkawannab reblogged this from sometimesagreatnotion
-
johnnydalle liked this
-
redsirocco liked this
-
nancysmith liked this
-
bricorama liked this
-
dangatorium liked this
-
youmakemesad-shootingstar reblogged this from sometimesagreatnotion
-
is1ofthemliar liked this
-
lepetitstace reblogged this from sometimesagreatnotion
-
rocksprings liked this
-
supercon liked this
-
pelusasenlacasa reblogged this from sometimesagreatnotion
-
sometimesagreatnotion posted this
Maybe nobody will care about printed books 50 years from now, but I do. When I read a book, I’m handling a specific object in a specific time and place. The fact that when I take the book off the shelf it still says the same thing – that’s reassuring,” said Franzen, according to the Telegraph. “Someone worked really hard to make the language just right, just the way they wanted it. They were so sure of it that they printed it in ink, on paper. A screen always feels like we could delete that, change that, move it around. So for a literature-crazed person like me, it’s just not permanent enough.
— Jonathan Franzen doesn’t like ebooks (via sometimesagreatnotion)