-
anamid reblogged this from ayjay
-
mshedden reblogged this from ayjay
-
diasodzo liked this
-
rhythmandyourheartbeat reblogged this from ayjay
-
memonite reblogged this from journalofanobody
-
birdsong217 liked this
-
littlehouseontheprisonfarm liked this
-
m1lko reblogged this from journalofanobody
-
elysskama liked this
-
streamsofcontext liked this
-
journalofanobody reblogged this from veareflejos
-
lauracricket liked this
-
lauracricket reblogged this from ayjay and added:
Very important to remember.
-
kevinholtsberry liked this
-
womanwithaheadofroses liked this
-
doloresdepalabra liked this
-
veareflejos reblogged this from ayjay
-
iakttagelser reblogged this from ayjay
-
thearchivalist liked this
-
wtagg liked this
-
wtagg reblogged this from ayjay
-
damocleanthreads reblogged this from ayjay and added:
I wonder if there is an analogous rationale that fits within a less religious paradigm. Regardless this is an...
-
giftsoutright reblogged this from ayjay
-
veareflejos liked this
-
ayjay posted this
The effect of beauty, therefore, is good to the degree that, through its analogies, the goodness of created existence, the historical fall into unfreedom and disorder, and the possibility of regaining paradise through repentance and forgiveness, are recognized. Its effect is evil to the degree that beauty is taken, not as analogous to, but as identical with goodness, so that the artist regards himself or is regarded by others as God, the pleasure of beauty taken for the joy of Paradise, and the conclusion drawn that, since all is well in the work of art, all is well in history. But all is not well there.
— W. H. Auden, “Making, Knowing, and Judging” (in The Dyer’s Hand)
(Source: ayjay)